WEKO3
アイテム
Complement Clause with the Verb Know : You as "Object of Conceptualiation" or "Subject of Conceptualization"?
https://doi.org/10.60461/0002000527
https://doi.org/10.60461/000200052720a752bd-14ef-4713-973f-ad69111f205b
| 名前 / ファイル | ライセンス | アクション |
|---|---|---|
kokusai001001.pdf (654 KB)
|
|
| Item type | 紀要論文 / Departmental Bulletin Paper(1) | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 公開日 | 2024-11-05 | |||||||||
| タイトル | ||||||||||
| タイトル | Complement Clause with the Verb Know : You as "Object of Conceptualiation" or "Subject of Conceptualization"? | |||||||||
| 言語 | en | |||||||||
| 作成者 |
中島, 千春
× 中島, 千春
|
|||||||||
| アクセス権 | ||||||||||
| アクセス権 | open access | |||||||||
| アクセス権URI | http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2 | |||||||||
| 主題 | ||||||||||
| 言語 | en | |||||||||
| 主題Scheme | Other | |||||||||
| 主題 | complement clause | |||||||||
| 主題 | ||||||||||
| 言語 | en | |||||||||
| 主題Scheme | Other | |||||||||
| 主題 | factive verb know | |||||||||
| 主題 | ||||||||||
| 言語 | en | |||||||||
| 主題Scheme | Other | |||||||||
| 主題 | intersubjectivity | |||||||||
| 主題 | ||||||||||
| 言語 | en | |||||||||
| 主題Scheme | Other | |||||||||
| 主題 | sentence subject you | |||||||||
| 内容記述 | ||||||||||
| 内容記述タイプ | Abstract | |||||||||
| 内容記述 | This paper examines the cases where complement clauses with the verb know have the second person as their sentence subject.With the verb know, which is one of the factive predicates, truth of complements is generally presupposed (Kiparsky & Kiparsky, 1970), and even when the main clauses are negated the complements are not. Langacker sheds some light on this specific feature of factivity by presupposing two layers of conceptualization. In case of the verb know, if the main clauses are negated the complements are not because the proposition is “independently accessible to the speaker and accepted as being valid” (Langacker, 2002, pp. 203-204). When the sentence subject is you, however, there are anomalous cases where the propositions do not stay as valid if the main clauses are negated. Thus, this paper proposes two types of complement clauses with the verb know: type A in which factivity is kept intact; type B in which the feature of factivity is lost. The objective of this paper is to elucidate how such a difference in factivity is brought about. Each type is explicated based on the intersubjective view and the construal configuration of Verhagen (2005, 2007). This paper argues that type A represents the cases where the second person’s cognitive state is profiled as the object of conceptualization at the objective level; type B, on the other hand, represents the cases that profile the coordination relation between the speaker and the hearer, with respect to the same object of conceptualization. | |||||||||
| 言語 | en | |||||||||
| 出版者 | ||||||||||
| 出版者 | 福岡女学院大学国際キャリア学部 | |||||||||
| 言語 | ja | |||||||||
| 出版者 | ||||||||||
| 出版者 | Faculty of International Career Developmet, Fukuoka Jo Gakuin University | |||||||||
| 言語 | en | |||||||||
| 言語 | ||||||||||
| 言語 | eng | |||||||||
| 資源タイプ | ||||||||||
| 資源タイプ識別子（シンプル） | http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501 | |||||||||
| 資源タイプ（シンプル） | departmental bulletin paper | |||||||||
| 出版タイプ | ||||||||||
| 出版タイプ | VoR | |||||||||
| 出版タイプResource | http://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85 | |||||||||
| 識別子 | ||||||||||
| 識別子 | https://hdl.handle.net/11470/92 | |||||||||
| ID登録 | ||||||||||
| ID登録 | 10.60461/0002000527 | |||||||||
| ID登録タイプ | JaLC | |||||||||
| 収録物識別子 | ||||||||||
| 収録物識別子タイプ | PISSN | |||||||||
| 収録物識別子 | 21893942 | |||||||||
| 収録物識別子 | ||||||||||
| 収録物識別子タイプ | EISSN | |||||||||
| 収録物識別子 | 27590372 | |||||||||
| 収録物識別子 | ||||||||||
| 収録物識別子タイプ | NCID | |||||||||
| 収録物識別子 | AA12715636 | |||||||||
| 書誌情報 |
en : Fukuoka Jo Gakuin University Bulletin. Faculty of International Career Development ja : 福岡女学院大学紀要. 国際キャリア学部編 巻 1, p. 1-16, ページ数 16, 発行日 2015-03 |
|||||||||
